Surface roughness, gloss and color change of different composites after exposure to ultimate challenges

  • Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
  • Silvio José Mauro
  • André Luiz Fraga Briso
  • Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri Pires de Souza
  • Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
  • Ticiane Cestari Fagundes

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to investigate the effect of the association of chemical and mechanical degradation on the surface roughness, gloss and color of nano and microfilled composites. Method: Disc-shaped specimens (n=10) were prepared for three nanocomposites (Filtek Z350XT, IPS Empress Direct, Charisma Diamond) and three microfilled composites (Estelite Σ Quick, Durafill VS, Renamel). Afterpolishing, baselinesurfaceroughness, gloss and color measurements were obtained. Specimens were submitted subsequently to the following challenges: chemical for 1 week (Hydrochloric acid, Coca-Cola and Red Wine) and mechanical (Toothbrushing). Surface roughness and gloss data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test. Color difference (DE) was analyzed by one–way ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: The initial data were compared with those after challenges using the Wilcoxon test (p<0.05). All composites showed a significant increase (p<0.05) of surface roughness, after overstress. Filtek Z350 XT and Renamel had the lowest final surface roughness values and roughness increase (p<0.05). The comparative analysis revealed that Estelite Σ Quick and Renamel did not significantly change the gloss after challenges (p=0.185). Filtek Z350 XT and IPS Empress Direct had higher color variations, after the challenges than the other resins (p<0.05). Conclusion: Chemical and mechanical challenges influence on characteristics of all composites, except for gloss on Estelite Σ Quick and Renamel composites.

References

1.Hosoya Y, Shiraishi T, Puppin–Rontani RM, Powers JM. Effects of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel application on surface roughness, gloss and colour of different type resin composites. J Dent. 2011;39(10):700-6.
2.de Paula AB, de Fucio SB, Alonso RC, Ambrosano GM, Puppin–Rontani RM. Influence of chemical degradation on the surface properties of nano restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2014;39(3):E109-17.
3.Munchow EA, Ferreira AC, Machado RM, Ramos TS, Rodrigues-Junior SA, Zanchi CH. Effect of acidic solutions on the surface degradation of a micro-hybrid composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(4):321-6.
4.da Silva EM, de Sa Rodrigues CU, Dias DA, da Silva S, Amaral CM, Guimaraes JG. Effect of toothbrushing–mouthrinse–cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):521-9.
5.Voltarelli FR, Santos–Daroz CB, Alves MC, Cavalcanti AN, Marchi GM. Effect of chemical degradation followed by toothbrushing on the surface roughness of restorative composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(6):585-90.
6.Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13(4):258-69.
7.Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, Rousson V. Surface deterioration of denta materias after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4):306-19.
8.Lefever D, Perakis N, Roig M, Krejci I, Ardu S. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites. Am J Dent. 2012;25(1):54-8.
9.Sabatini C, Campillo M, Aref J. Color stability of ten resin-based restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(3):185-99.
10.Takahashi R, Jin J, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(1):75-82.
11.Catelan A, Suzuki TY, Becker F, Jr., Briso AL, Dos Santos PH. Influence of surface sealing on color stability and roughness of composite submitted to ultraviolet-accelerated aging. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 May;8(2). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12203.
12.Schulze KA, Marshall SJ, Gansky SA, Marshall GW. Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater. 2003;19(7):612-9.
13.Briso AL, Caruzo LP, Guedes AP, Catelan A, dos Santos PH. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness and microhardness of restorative materials submitted to erosive challenges. Oper Dent. 2011;36(4):397-402.
14.Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short–term period. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(2):124-31.
15.Carvalho FG, Sampaio CS, Fucio SB, Carlo HL, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM. Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three glass ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite. Oper Dent. 2012;37(5):509–17.
16.Lemos CA, Mauro SJ, Dos Santos PH, Briso AL, Fagundes TC. Influence of Mechanical and Chemical Degradation in the Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color of Microhybrid Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(4):283-8.
17.Rahim TN, Mohamad D, Md Akil H, Ab Rahman I. Water sorption characteristics of restorative dental composites immersed in acidic drinks. Dent Mater. 2012;28(6):e63-70.
18.Ren YF, Feng L, Serban D, Malmstrom HS. Effects of common beverage colorants on color stability of dental composite resins: the utility of a thermocycling stain challenge model in vitro. J Dent. 2012;40 Suppl 1:e48-56.
19.Heintze SD, Forjanic M. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro. Oper Dent. 2005;30(5):617-26.
20.Lee YK, Lu H, Oguri M, Powers JM. Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):370-6.
21.Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent. 2004;17(4):262-6.
22.Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M. Characterization of water sorption, solubility and filler particles of light-cured composite resins. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(4):314-8.
23.Suzuki T, Kyoizumi H, Finger WJ, et al. Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with calcium carbonate slurry. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(6):708-16.
24.Silikas N, Kavvadia K, Eliades G, Watts D. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach. Am J Dent. 2005;18(2):95-100.
25.Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Eliades G. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites. Oper Dent. 2013;38(1):E1-12.
26.Torres CRG, Da Silva TM, Sales ALLS, Pucci CR, Borges AB. Influence of Chemical Degradation and Toothbrushing on Surface of Composites. World J Dent 2015;6(2):65-70.
27.Akova T, Ozkomur A, Uysal H. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of provisional restorative materials. Dent Mater 2006 Dec;22(12):1130-4.
28.Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Moore BK. Influence of polishing instruments on the surface texture of resin composites. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(1):61–7.
Published
2017-10-24
How to Cite
LEMOS, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo et al. Surface roughness, gloss and color change of different composites after exposure to ultimate challenges. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. e17077, oct. 2017. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <https://www.fop.unicamp.br/bjos/index.php/bjos/article/view/178>. Date accessed: 16 july 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v16i1.8651057.
Section
Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)