Using molecular markers to assess Streptococcus mutans variability and the biological risk for caries

  • Ivana Froede Neiva
  • Mônica Moreira
  • Renata Rodrigues Gomes
  • Debora Klisiowicz
  • Ricardo Lehtonen Rodrigues Souza
  • Vânia Aparecida Vicente


Aim: To characterize the genetic variability of Streptococcus mutans isolates and to correlate this variability with different colonization profiles observed during dental caries in a sample of children. Methods: S. mutans samples were isolated from the saliva of 30 children with varying histories of dental caries, and they were characterized according to morphological and biochemical markers and the sequences of their 16S-23S intergenic spacer region. The genetic variability of the isolates was first assessed using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Next, the isolates were differentiated by sequencing a specific region of the gene encoding the enzyme glucosyltransferase B (gtfB). Results: Characterization using RAPD markers uncovered significant genetic variability among the samples and indicated the existence of clusters, which allowed us to reconstruct both the origin and clinical history of the disease. By sequencing the 16S-23S intergenic region, it was found that all of the isolates belonged to the species S. mutans. Based on the genetic similarity of the isolates and pattern of amino acid variations identified by partial sequencing of the gtfB gene, base-pair changes were identified and correlated with different virulence patterns among the isolates. Conclusions: The partial sequencing of the gtfB gene can be a useful tool for elucidating the colonization patterns of S. mutans. As amino acid variations are likely to be correlated with differences in biological risk, molecular characterization, such as that described in this paper, could be the key for assessing the development of dental caries in children.


1. Berkowitz RJ. Mutans streptococci: acquisition and transmission. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28: 106-9.
2. Phattarataratip E, Olson B, Broffitt B, Qian F, Brogden KA, Drake DR, et al. Streptococcus mutans strains recovered from caries-active or cariesfree individuals differ in sensitivity to host antimicrobial peptides. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2011; 26: 187-99.
3. Kamiya RU, Taiete T, Gonçalves RB. Mutacins of Streptococcus mutans. Braz J Microbiol. 2011; 42: 1248-58.
4. Koo H, Xiao J, Klein MI, Jeon JG. Exopolysaccharides produced by Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases modulate the establishment of microcolonies within multispecies biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192: 3024-32.
5. Beigton D. The complex oral microflora of high-risk individuals and groups and its role in the caries process. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33: 248-55.
6. Matee MIN, Mikx FHM, De Soet JS, Maselle SY, De Graff J, Van Palenstein Helderman WH. Mutans streptococci in caries-active and caries free infants in Tanzania. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1993; 8: 322-4.
7. Saxena D, Caufield PW, Li Y, Brown S, Song J, Norman R. Genetic classification of severe early childhood caries by use of subtracted DNA fragments from Streptococcus mutans. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46: 2868-73.
8. Domejean S, Zhan L, DenBesten PK, Stamper J, Boyce WT, Featherstone JD. Horizontal transmission of Mutans streptococci in children. J Dent Res. 2010; 89: 51-5.
9. Moreira M, Vicente VA, Glienke C. Genetic Variability of Streptococcus mutans isolated from low-income families, as shown by RAPD markers, Braz J Microbiol. 2007; 38: 729-35.
10. Spolidorio DMP, Hofling JF, Pizzolito AC, Rosa EA, Negrini TC, Spolidoro LC. Genetic polymorphism of Streptococcus mutans in brazilian family members. Braz J Microbiol. 2003; 34: 213-7.
11. Fujiwara T, Terao Y, Hoshino T, Kawabata S, Ooshima T, Sobue S, et al. Molecular analyses of glucosyltransferase genes among strains of Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998; 161: 331-6.
12. Hoshino T, Kawaguchi M, Shimizu N, Hoshino N, Ooshima T, Fujiwara T. PCR detection and identification of oral streptococci in saliva samples using gtf genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004; 48: 195-9.
13. Vicente VA, Moreira M, Zardo EL, Braga SF, Costa AO, Neiva IF, et al. Multidisciplinary strategy for the prevention and control of diseases clinically manifesting in childhood. RGO. 2011; 59: 591-7.
14. Moreira M, Noschang J, Neiva IF, Carvalho Y, Higuti IH, Vicente VA. Methodological Variations in the isolation of genomic DNA from Streptococcus bacteria. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2010; 53: 845-9.
15. Meyer D. Human evolutionary trees: a discussion on phylogenetic interference. Monographs series. 1993; 3.
16. Rohlf FJ. NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter Software. New York; 2000. 98p.
17. Coelho ASG. Assessment of dendrograms based on estimates of the genetic distances/similarities by means of the bootstraps procedure. BOOD 3.03. Goiânia, GO: Department of General Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Goiás; 2005.
18. Chen CC, Teng LJ, Chang TC. Identification of clinically relevant viridans group streptococci by sequence analysis of the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA spacer region. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42: 2651-7.
19. Oho T, Yamashita Y, Shimazaki Y, Kushiyama M, Koga T. Simple and rapid detection of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in human saliva by polymerase chain reaction. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2000; 15: 258-62.
20. Murphy KM, Berg KD, Eshleman JR. Sequencing of genomic DNA by combined amplification and cycle sequencing reaction. Clin Chem. 2005; 51: 35-9.
21. Staden R, Judge DP, Bonfield JK. Sequence assembly and finishing methods. Methods Biochem Anal. 2001; 43: 303-22.
22. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994; 22: 4673-80.
23. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004; 5: 150-63.
24. Kreth J, Merrit J, Shi W, Qi F. Competition and coexistence between Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus Sanguinis in the dental biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187: 7193-203.
25. Alaluusua S, Matto J, Gronroos, L, Innila, S, Torkko, H, Asikainem, S, et al. Oral colonization by more than one clonal type of Mutans streptococci in children with nursing-bottle dental caries. Arch Oral Biol. 1996; 41: 167-73.
26. Crielaard W, Zaura E, Schuller AA, Huse SM, Montijn RC, Keijser BJ. Exploring the oral microbiota of children at various developmental stages of their dentition in the relation to their oral health. BMC Med Genomics. 2011; 4: 22.
27. Bowen WH, Koo H. Biology of Streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms. Caries Res. 2011; 45: 69-86.
28. Chia JS, Hsu TY, Teng LJ, Chen JY, Hahn LJ, Yang CS. Glucosyltransferase gene polymorphism among Streptococcus mutans strains. Infect Immun. 1991; 59: 1656-60.
29. Fujiwara T, Hoshino T, Ooshima T, Hamada S. Differential and quantitative analyses of mRNA expression of glucosyltransferases from Streptococcus mutans MT8148. J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 109-13.
30. Argimón S, Alekseyenko AV, DeSalle R, Caufield PW. Phylogenetic analysis of glucosyltransferases and implications for the coevolution of Mutans streptococci with their mammalian hosts. PLos ONE 2013; 8: e56305.
How to Cite
NEIVA, Ivana Froede et al. Using molecular markers to assess Streptococcus mutans variability and the biological risk for caries. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. 235-241, dec. 2016. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 22 july 2019.
Original Research