Preventive effect of an orthodontic compomer against enamel demineralization around bonded brackets

  • Alan Rafael Martins Savariz
  • Mariana Marquezan
  • Maurício Mezomo

Abstract

Orthodontic appliances predispose to the accumulation of plaque due to the great number of retentive sites, which might lead to enamel demineralization adjacent to the accessories. Aim: To assess the effectiveness of a compomer for orthodontic bonding in preventing the formation of white spots around orthodontic brackets. Methods: Forty extracted human premolars were divided into two groups: control group (CG), in which conventional resin Transbond™ XT Light Cure (3M Unitek™) was used to bond the brackets; and experimental group (EG), in which the compomer Transbond™ Plus Color Change (3M Unitek™) was used. pH cycling was performed for 17 days to induce the demineralization process. Enamel on the buccal face was photographed under a stereomicroscope (at 10x magnification) before (t0) and after (t1) pH cycling. The images were used to compare demineralization between the groups by using a visual scale. Results: A statistically significant difference between control and experimental groups was found (p=0.004) showing that the compomer was more efficient than the conventional resin in preventing white spots. Conclusions: The compomer Transbond Plus Color Change was capable of inhibiting enamel demineralization adjacent to the bonding area of brackets. However, the inhibition halo did not exceed 1 mm.

References

1. Maltz M, Carvalho J. Diagnóstico de doença cárie. In: Kriger L. ABOPREV promoção de saúde bucal. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 1997.
2. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances—an overview. Br J Orthod. 1992; 19: 199-205.
3. Larmas M. Saliva and dental caries: diagnostic tests for normal dental practice. Int Dent J. 1992; 42: 199-208.
4. Pender N. Aspects of oral health in orthodontic patients. Br J Orthod. 1986; 13: 95-103.
5. Corbett JA, Brown LR, Keene HJ, Horton IM. Comparison of Streptococcus mutans concentrations in non-banded and banded orthodontic patients. J Dent Res. 1981; 60: 1936-42.
6. Mattingly JA, Sauer GJ, Yancey JM, Arnold RR. Enhancement of Streptococcus mutans colonization by direct bonded orthodontic appliances. J Dent Res. 1983; 62: 1209-11.
7. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Griswold PG. The effect of a fluoride program on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93: 29-37.
8. Lundstrom F, Krasse B. Caries incidence in orthodontic patients with high levels of Streptococcus mutans. Eur J Orthod. 1987; 9: 117-21.
9. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94: 68-73.
10. Wiltshire WA, Janse van Rensburg SD. Fluoride release from four visible light-cured orthodontic adhesive resins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108: 278-83.
11. Benson PE, Parkin N, Millett DT, Dyer FE, Vine S, Shah A. Fluorides for the prevention of white spots on teeth during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004: CD003809.
12. Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96: 423-7.
13. Chin MY, Sandham A, Rumachik EN, Ruben JL, Huysmans MC. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 547-53.
14. Dijkman GE, de Vries J, Lodding A, Arends J. Long-term fluoride release of visible light-activated composites in vitro: a correlation with in situ demineralisation data. Caries Res. 1993; 27: 117-23.
15. Chadwick BL, Roy J, Knox J, Treasure ET. The effect of topical fluorides on decalcification in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128: 601-6; quiz 70.
16. Aboush YE, Torabzadeh H. Fluoride release from tooth-colored restorative materials: a 12-month report. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998; 64: 561-4, 68.
17. Preston AJ, Higham SM, Agalamanyi EA, Mair LH. Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 936-40.
18. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 343-62.
19. Passalini P, Fidalgo TKS, Caldeira EM, Gleiser R, Nojima MCG, Maia LC. Preventive effect of fluoridated orthodontic resins subjected to high cariogenic challenges. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21: 211-5.
20. Ahn SJ, Lee SJ, Lee DY, Lim BS. Effects of different fluoride recharging protocols on fluoride ion release from various orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 2011; 39: 196-201.
21. Benson PE, Shah AA, Millett DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2005; 32: 102-14.
22. Behnan SM, Arruda AO, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Sohn W, Peters MC. In-vitro evaluation of various treatments to prevent demineralization next to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138: 712 e1-7; discussion 712-3.
23. Rix D, Foley TF, Banting D, Mamandras A. A comparison of fluoride release by resin-modified GIC and polyacid-modified composite resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 120: 398-405.
24. Rogers S, Chadwick B, Treasure E. Fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives and decalcification in patients with fixed appliances: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138: 390 e1-8; discussion 90-1.
25. Paschos E, Kleinschrodt T, Clementino-Luedemann T, Huth KC, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, et al. Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 603-12.
26. Leizer C, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE. Efficacy of a filledresin sealant in preventing decalcification during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 796-800.
27. Millett DT, McCabe JF. Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement— a review. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18: 385-99.
28. Forss H, Seppa L. Prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials. Scand J Dent Res. 1990; 98: 173-8.
29. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Shams M. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997; 105: 81-5.
30. Hellwig E, Lussi A. What is the optimum fluoride concentration needed for the remineralization process? Caries Res. 2001; 35 Suppl 1:57-9.
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
SAVARIZ, Alan Rafael Martins; MARQUEZAN, Mariana; MEZOMO, Maurício. Preventive effect of an orthodontic compomer against enamel demineralization around bonded brackets. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. 10-13, dec. 2016. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <https://www.fop.unicamp.br/bjos/index.php/bjos/article/view/510>. Date accessed: 17 july 2019.
Section
Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)