Atraumatic Restorative Treatment used for caries control at public schools in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

  • Cristina Gibilini
  • Janice Simpson de Paula
  • Regina Marques
  • Maria da Luz Rosário Sousa

Abstract

Aim: The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) as a measure to control caries at public schools in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, discussing the importance of the promotion of individual and collective health and (2) to evaluate the longevity of ART restorations in the first six months after placement. Methods: The sample consisted of 173 schoolchildren aged 5 to 10 years from public schools in Piracicaba, treated according to ART approach and reassessed after six months. Results: It could be observed that after ART, a large part of the students initially fitted into risk E classification (high caries risk) were reclassified into risk B classification (moderate caries), characterized by the presence of restored teeth only (caries free teeth; c = 0). In addition, 81.78% success rate was obtained after six months of ART. Conclusions: ART was considered effective in health promotion programs, given its importance as a measure to control caries in schoolchildren.

References

1. Brazil. Ministry of Health. Secretary of Health Care. Department of Primary Care. Project “SB Brasil” 2003. Oral health status of the Brazilian population 2002-2003: principal results. Brasília: Ministry of Health, 2004.
2. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique and development. J Public Health Dent 1996; 56:135-40.
3. Roshan NM, Anand LS, Deshpande SD. Microbiological evaluation of salivary Streptococcus mutans from children of age 5-7 years, pre- and post-atraumatic restorative treatment. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2010; 1(2): 94-7.
4. Almeida Neves A, Cutinho E, Cardoso MV, Lembrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Current concepts and techniques for caries excavation and adhesion to residual dentin. J Adhes Dent 2011 Feb; 13(1): 7-22
5. Frencken JE. The ART approach using glass ionomers in relation to global oral health care. Dental Materials, 2010, 26: 1-6.
6. Menezes JPL, Rosenblatt A, Medeiros E. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: A Comparison Between 2 glass ionomer cements. Journal of Dentistry for Children 2006; 73:2: 91-7.
7. Silva RC, Zuanon ACC, Spolidorio DMP, Campos JADB. Antibacterial activity of four ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. J Mater Sci: Mater Med, 2007; 18: 1859-1862.
8. Taifour D, Francken JE, Beiruti N, van´t Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Res 2002;36:437–444.
9. Frencken JE, van’t Hof MA, Taifour D, Al-Zaher I. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35: 207–214.
10. Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM et al. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2- year results. Int Dent J 2004; 54:42-46.
11. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998; 26: 372-81.
12. Holmgren CJ, Lo ECM, Hu DY, Wan HC: ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children – results after three years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000; 28: 314–20
13. van Gemert-Schriks MCM, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IHA. Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Invest 2007; 11:337–343.
14. Couto GBL, Vasconcelos MMVB, Melo MMC, Camelo CAC, Valença PAM. Prevalence of caries, white spot and visible plaque in children 0- 36 months, assisted by the Family Health Program in the City of Camaragibe - PE. Odontol Clín-Cient 2005; 4:19-28.
15. Sant´anna, G.R.; Bonecker, M.J.S.; Diarte, D.A.; Suga, S.N. Book of Pediatric Dentistry; Sonetos Ed. 2002 apud Martins, A.A., Santos, A.A.; Barreto, M.A.C.; Oliveira, C.C.C. Table of risk factors for decay applicable in public health.Odontologic . Clín. Científ., Recife, 2003; 2(1): 37-42, Jan/Abr.
16. Ministry of health. SS-95 resolution, 27/06/2000. Recommendations about the use of fluoride products in the “SUS” / SP according to the risk of dental caries. [on line] Available in URL: http://www.saude.sp.gov.br/ fr_sbucal.html.
17. Schriks MCM, van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic perspective of ART: psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 15–20.
18. Pellegrinetti MB, Imparato JCP, Bressan MC, Pinheiro SL, Echeverria S. Evaluation of the glass ionomer cement retention in cavities restored by atypical atraumatic restorative technique. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2005; 5(3): 209-13.
19. IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Data de Piracicaba. Available in: http://www.ibge.gov.br.
20. São Paulo (State). Ministry of Economy and Planning. Foundation State System of Data Analysis. Municipality of Piracicaba Profile [cited in 2011 Nov, 21]. Available em: http://www.seade.sp.gov.br/produtos/perfil/ perfil.php.
21. Basting RT, Pereira AC, Meneghim MC. Evaluation of the dental caries prevalence in schoolchildren from Piracicaba SP, Brasil, after 25 years of fluoridation of public water supply. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo 1997; 11(4):287-92.
22. Cortellazzi, KL, Tagliaferro EPS, Assaf AV, Ambrosano GMB, Bittar TO, Meneghim MC, Pereira AC. Influence of socioeconomic, demographic and clinical experience of dental caries in preschool children in Piracicaba, SP. Rev Bras Epidemil 2009; 12 (3): 490-500.
23. Guerra LM, Pereira AC, Pereira SM, Meneghim MC. Assessment of socioeconomic variables in the caries and fluorosis prevalence in cities with and without water supply fluoridation. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2010; 39(5): 255-262.
24. Word Health Organization. Oral health surveys, basics methods. Geneva: Word Health Organization; 1997.
25. Sacramento PA, Borges AFS, Puppin Rontani RM. Actuarial analysis in a comparative study of two glass ionomer cements used in the technique of ART: direct and indirect assessment after 3 and 6 months. Tev odontol. UNESP 2009; 38(5):291-300.
26. Lima DC, Saliba NA, Moimaz SAS. Atraumatic restorative treatment and it aplication in public health. RGO 2008; 56:71-9.
27. Navarro MFL, Modena KCS, Freitas MCCA, Fagundes TC. Transfering ART research into education in Brazil. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17(sp issue): 99-106.
28. Smales RJ, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for primary teeth; review of literature. Pediatric Dentistry 2000; 22(4):294- 8.
29. Figueiredo CH, Lima FA, Moura KS. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: assessment of their suitability as a strategy for controlling dental caries in public health. RBPS 2003; 17(3);109-18.
30. Bresciani E. Clinical trials with atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in deciduous and permanent teeth. J Appl Oral Sci 2006; 14: 14-9.
31. Rios LE, Essado REP, Freire MCM. Tratamento restaurador atraumático: knowledge and attitudes of dentists in the public service of Goiânia-GO. Rev Odontol UNESP 2006; 35(1): 75-80.
32. Mickenautsch S, Munshi I, Grossman ES. Comparative cost of ART and conventional treatment within a dental school clinic. SADJ. 2002; 57(2): 52-8.
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
GIBILINI, Cristina et al. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment used for caries control at public schools in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. 14-18, dec. 2016. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <https://www.fop.unicamp.br/bjos/index.php/bjos/article/view/511>. Date accessed: 21 july 2019.
Section
Original Research