Ethics in the provision of removable partial dentures

  • Arcelino Farias-Neto
  • Renata Suellen Galvão da Silva
  • Alexandre da Cunha Diniz
  • André Ulisses Dantas Batista
  • Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the construction of cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures by commercial private dental laboratories. Methods: Ninety master casts for fabrication of cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures were obtained from three commercial laboratories randomly selected. Casts were assessed for dental arch treated, Kennedy classification, cast surveying, denture design information provided by the dentist, and mouth preparation (rest seat, guiding plane and retentive area). Dental technicians answered a questionnaire regarding qualification of assisted dentists, monthly number of framework castings, and use of dental surveyor. Mouth preparation was compared among laboratories using Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). Results: The percentage of Kennedy class I was 16%, class II 19%, class III 56%, and class IV 9%. The majority of master cats (51%) examined was sent to dental laboratories without any design information and did not comply with ethical guidelines in the provision of RPD. Approximately half of the casts were considered “inappropriate” for guiding planes and retentive areas. One of the laboratories presented all casts “inappropriate” for rest seat distribution (p<0.001). Conclusions: Mouth preparation frequently failed for guiding planes, retentive areas and distribution of rest seats. It is necessary to provide students with adequate clinical experience at the dental school environment, which will actually be carried into the practice of dentistry.

References

1. Brazil. Ministry of Health. Brazilian Oral Health Project: oral health status of Brazilian population 2002-2003 – Main results. Brasília; 2004.
2. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry, L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 5-8.
3. Carr AB, Glen PM, Brown DT. Partially edentulous epidemiology, physiology, and terminology. McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics. Saint Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. p.3-10.
4. Davenport JC, Basker RM, Heath JR, Ralph JP, Glantz PO, Hammond P. Communication between the dentist and the dental technician. Br Dent J. 2000; 189: 471-4.
5. Owall B, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Davenport J et al. Removable partial denture design: a need to focus on hygienic principles? Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 371-8.
6. Basker RM, Harrison A, Davenport JC, Marshall JL. Partial denture design in general dental practice – 10 years on. Br Dent J. 1988; 165: 245-9.
7. Woolfardt JF, Han-Kuang T, Basker RM. Removable partial denture design in Alberta dental practices. J Can Dent Assoc. 1996; 62: 637-44.
8. Von Steyern PV, Widolf-Kroon R, Nilner K, Basker RM. Removable partial denture design in general dental practice in Sweden. Swed Dent J. 1995; 19: 205-11.
9. Dullabh HD, Slabbert JCG, Becker PJ. Partial denture prosthodontics procedures employed by practising graduates of the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1993; 48: 129-34.
10. Taylor TD, Mathews AC, Aquilino SA, Logan NS. Prosthodontic survey. Part I: removable prosthodontic laboratory survey. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52: 598-601.
11. Lynch CD, Allen PF. A survey of chrome-cobalt RPD design in Ireland. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 362-4.
12. Radhi A, Lynch CD, Hannigan A. Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 153-7.
13. Owall G, Bieniek KW, Spiekermann H. Removable partial denture production in western Germany. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26: 621-7.
14. Kratochvil FJ. Influence of occlusal rest position and clasp design on movement of abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1963; 13: 114-24.
15. McCracken WL. Contemporary partial denture designs. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 409-17.
16. Allen PF, Jepson NJ, Doughty J, Bond S. Attitudes and practice in the provision of removable partial dentures. Br Dent J. Br Dent J. 2008; 204: E2. Epub 2007.
17. Schwarz WD, Barsby MJ. A survey of the practice of partial denture prosthetics in the United Kingdom. J Dent. 1980; 8: 95-101.
18. Manly RS, Vinton P. Factors influencing denture function. J Prosthet Dent. 1951; 1: 578-86. Ethics in the provision of removable partial dentures
19. Fayyaz M, Ghani F. Appropriateness of knowledge and practices of dentists relating to using clasps in removable partial dentures. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008; 20: 52-5.
20. Principles, concepts, and practices in prosthodontics – 1994. Academy of Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 73: 73-94.
21. Rice JA, Lynch CD, McAndrew R, Milward PJ. Tooth preparation for rest seats for cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures completed by general dental practitioners. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 72-8.
22. Neto AF, Duarte ARC, Shiratori FK, Leite PHAS, Rizzatti-Barbosa CMR, Bonachela WC. Evaluation of senior Brazilian dental students about mouth preparation and removable partial denture design. J Dent Educ. 2010; 74: 1255-60.
23. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Why do dentists struggle with removable partial denture design? An assessment of financial and educational issues. Br Dent J. 2006; 200: 277-81.
24. Federal Council of Dentistry. Code of Ethics for Dentists. Rio de Janeiro: Federal Council of Dentistry; 2002.
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
FARIAS-NETO, Arcelino et al. Ethics in the provision of removable partial dentures. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. 19-24, dec. 2016. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <https://www.fop.unicamp.br/bjos/index.php/bjos/article/view/512>. Date accessed: 16 july 2019.
Section
Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)