Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation

  • S. Anitha Rao
  • N. Manasa


Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of various irrigating solutions on calcium hydroxide (Apex cal and RC cal) removal with the use of ultrasonics. Methods: The root canals of 120 single-rooted maxillary central incisors were prepared using the stepback technique. The teeth were decoronated and split longitudinally. After filling, the two halves of roots were reassembled with sticky wax and each group was further divided into four subgroups according to the irrigating solution: Smear Clear, 10% citric acid, 5% EDTA and 3% NaOCl. Evaluation for cleanliness was done under a microscope with ×12.5 magnification. Statistical analysis was done with Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests at 5% level of significance. Results: There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for calcium hydroxide (Apex Cal and RC Cal) removal by different irrigants. There were more residues in the apical groove than in the coronal groove (p<0.05). Conclusions: When the different irrigants were compared at coronal and apical levels, Smear Clear and citric acid were more effective in calcium hydroxide removal than EDTA and NaOCl.


1. Nandini S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study. J Endod. 2006; 32: 1097-1.
2. Pacios MG, de la Casa ML, de los Angeles Bulacio M, López ME.. Calcium hydroxide association with different vehicles: in vitro action on some dentinal components. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 96: 96-1.
3. de Souza CAS, Teles RP, Souto R, Chaves MAE, Colombo APV. Ntic therapy associated with calcium hydroxide as an intracanal dressing: microbiologic evaluation by the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. J Endod. 2005; 31: 79-83.
4. Rodig. T, Vogel. S, Zapf. A, Hulsmann.M. Efficacy of different irrigants in the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 519-7.
5. Stomas D. Sadeghi E, Haasch G, Gerstein H. An in vitro comparison study to quantitate the debridement ability of hand, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation. J Endod. 1987; 13: 434-40.
6. Lev R, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers W. An in vitro comparison of the step back technique versus step back/ultrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes. J Endod. 1987; 13: 523-30.
7. van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies. Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 52-7.
8. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Al Reader, Beck M. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2005; 31: 166-70.
9. Lui JN, Kuah HG, Chen NN. Effect of EDTA with/without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer. J Endod. 2007; 33: 472-5.
10. Cameron JA. The use of ultrasonics in the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod. 1983; 9: 289-92.
11. Sen BH, Ertürk O, Piºkin B. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 622-7.
12. Hennequin M, Pajot J, Aviqnant D. Effects of different pH values of citric acid solutions on the calcium and phosphorus contents of human root dentin. J Endod. 1994; 20: 551-4.
13. Hulsmann M, Heckendorff, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 810-30.
14. Teixeira CS, Felippe MCS, FelippeWT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 285-90.
15. Balvedi RPA, Versiani MA, Manna FF, Biffi JCG. A comparison of two techniques for the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 763-8.
16. Salgado RJ, Moura-Netto C, Yamazaki AK, Cardoso LN, de Moura AA, Prokopowitsch I. Comparison of different irrigants on calcium hydroxide medication removal: microscopic cleanliness evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107: 580-4.
17. Kenee DM, Allemang JD, Johnson JD, Hellstein J, Nichol BK. A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Endod. 2006; 32: 563-5.
18. Margelos J, Eliades G, Verdelis C, Palaghias G. Interaction of calcium hydroxide with zinc oxide eugenol type sealers: a potential clinical problem. J Endod. 1997; 23: 43-8.
How to Cite
RAO, S. Anitha; MANASA, N.. Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. 52-55, dec. 2016. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <https://www.fop.unicamp.br/bjos/index.php/bjos/article/view/518>. Date accessed: 15 july 2019.
Original Research