Social and demographic profile of Unified Health System users in a medium-sized city of southern Brazil

  • Simone Gomes Dias de Oliveira
  • Pedro Henrique Azambuja Carvalho
  • Rafael Guerra Lund


Aim: The use of health services is a complex behavior and results from a series of determinants that includes the users’ social and demographic characteristics. The current survey interprets the social and demographic profile of Unified Health System (UHS; SUS in Portuguese) users from Pelotas RS Brazil, which was conducted by interviews with 333 users from five Health Basic Units (HBUs). Methods: The social and demographic characterization was deployed by the variables sex, age, occupation, city/town or district of origin, number of family members, use of continuous medication, diseases and family income. Results: HBU users were mostly women (82.4%), within the 30-40-year-old age range (21.4%), housewives (36.3%) from Pelotas (96.2%) and from the district of Fragata (26.1%). Families of users comprise mostly two to four members (66.6%), with an income of one to two minimum wages (66.2%). Fifty-one percent of the interviewees do not use continuous medication, while hypertension was the most cited disease (51.8%). Conclusions: An understanding of HBU users’ characteristics and their associated social and demographic context may contribute towards a better reception and may confirm the UHS contribution towards universality and equality of public health care.


1. Castilla EE, Luquetti DV. Brazil: Public Health Genomics. Public Health Genomics 2009;12:53-8.
2. Oliveira DC, Sá CP, Gomes AMT, Ramos RS, Pereira NA, Santos WCR. Brazilian National Health Policy: health professionals’ social representation. Cad Saude Publica. 2008;24:197-206.
3. Cesconetto A, Lapa JS, Calvo MCM. Evaluation of productive efûciency in the Uniûed National Health System hospitals in the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2008;20:2407-17.
4. Moretti-Pires RO. Complexity in the Family Health and education of future health professionals. Interface (Botucatu). 2009;13:153-66.
5. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). National Survey by Household Sample Survey: Access and use of health services in 2003. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2005.
6. Ribeiro MCSA, Barata RB, Almeida MF, Silva ZP. Sociodemographic profile and utilization patterns of the public health care system (SUS)– PNAD 2003. Cien Saude Colet. 2006;11:1011-22.
7. Silva ZP, Ribeiro MCSA, Barata RB, Almeida MF. Sociodemographic profile and utilization pattern of health services of the Unified Health System (SUS). Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16:3807-16.
8. Buss PM, Pellegrini Filho A. Inequalities in health in Brazil, our most serious disease: comments on the reference document and the work of the National Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22:2005-8.
9. Backes DS, Koerich MS, Rodrigues ACRL, Drago LC, Klock P, Erdmann AL. What do the users think and say about the Brazilian Health System (SUS)? An analysis of meanings based on the users’ rights booklet. Cien Saude Colet. 2009;14:903-10.
10. Horta NC, Sena RR, Silva MEO, Oliveira SR, Rezende VA. Practice of family health teams: challenges for the promotion of health care. Rev Bras Enferm. 2009;62:524-9.
11. Travassos C, Viacava F, Fernandes C, Almeida CM. Social and geographical inequalities in health services utilization in Brazil. Cien Saude Colet. 2000;5:133-49.
12. Torres MEA, Ribeiro PM, Machado CJ. Access to gynecological consultations in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Bras Estud Popul. 2008;25:49-69.
13. Schraiber LB, Figueiredo WS, Gomes R, Couto MT, Pinheiro TF, Machin R et al. Health needs and masculinities: primary health care services for me. Cad Saude Publica. 2010;26:961-70.
14. Guanais FC. Health equity in Brazil. BMJ. 2010;341:c6542.
15. Lima-Costa MF, Barreto SM, Giatti L. Health status, physical functioning, health services utilization, and expenditures on medicines among Brazilian elderly: a descriptive study using data from the National Household Survey. Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19:735-43.
16. Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR. Why are some people healthy and others not?: the determinants of health of populations. Nova York: Aldine De Gruyter; c1994. p.3-26.
17. Dias-da-Costa JS, Gigante DP, Horta BL, Barros FC, Victora CG. Pattern of health services utilization by adults of the Pelotas birth cohort from 1982 to 2004-5, Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2008;42:51-9.
18. Malta DC, Cezario AC, Moura L, Neto OLM, Silva Jr. JB. Building surveillance and prevention for chronic non communicable diseases in the national Unified Health System. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2006;15:47-65.
19. Campos GS. Political and organizational challenges in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: twenty years of public policy. Cad Saude Publica. 2008;24:2200-1.
20. Gouveia GC, Souza WV, Luna CF, Souza-Junior PRB, Szwarcwald CL. User satisfaction in the Brazilian health system: associated factors and regional difference. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2009;12:281-96.
How to Cite
DE OLIVEIRA, Simone Gomes Dias; CARVALHO, Pedro Henrique Azambuja; LUND, Rafael Guerra. Social and demographic profile of Unified Health System users in a medium-sized city of southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. 67-71, dec. 2016. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 20 july 2019.
Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)