Transverse dimension of the alveolar bone in different masticatory patterns

  • Marcio José da Silva Campos
  • Paula Liparini Caetano
  • Fernanda Farage da Costa Felipe
  • Gabriella Moreira de Carvalho
  • Marcelo Reis Fraga
  • Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate, through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), the transverse dimension of the alveolar bone in the posterior region of the maxilla and mandible in subjects with different patterns of mastication, comparing both sides of the arches according to the performance of the masticatory function. Methods: 39 subjects not orthodontically treated, with normal occlusion or symmetrical malocclusion, and normal periodontal condition were selected. Twenty-one subjects (54%) were identified as having preferential unilateral mastication, 11 subjects (28%) had bilateral mastication and 7 (18%) had exclusive unilateral mastication. All participants were submitted to CBCT and the buccolingual dimension of the posterior regions was evaluated at a height of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10mm from the alveolar crest. Results and Conclusion: Subjects with bilateral mastication showed statistically significant difference between the right and left sides at the heights of 6 (p=0.030) and 8mm (p=0.023) between the first and second maxillary premolars. There was no difference in the transverse dimension of the alveolar bone in the posterior regions of maxilla and mandible between preferred and non-preferred sides in subjects with preferred unilateral mastication and between right and left sides in subjects with bilateral mastication.

References

1. Felício CM, Couto GA, Ferreira CLP, Mestriner Junior W. Reliability of masticatory e ciency with beads and correlation with the muscle activity. Pro Fono. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):225-30.
2. Hiemae K, Heath MR, Gillian H, Kazazoglu E, Murray J, Sapper D, Hamblett K. Natural bites, food consistency and feeding behaviour in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1996 Feb;41(2):175-89.
3. Raphangkorakit J, Thothongkam NE, Supanont N. Chewing-side determination of three food textures. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Jan;33(1):2-7.
4. Kazazoglu E, Heath MR, Muller F. A simple test for determination of the preferred chewing side. J Oral Rehabil. 1994 Nov;21(6):723.
5. Wilding RJ, Lewin A. The determination of optimal human jaw movements based on their association with chewing performance. Arch Arch Oral Biol. 1994 Apr;39(4):333-43.
6. Farias Gomes SG, Custodio W, Moura Jufer JS, Del Bel Cury AA, Rodrigues Garcia RCM. Correlation of mastication and masticatory movements and effect of chewing side preference. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):351-5.
7. Diernberger S, Bernhardt O, Schwahn C, Kordass B. Self-reported chewing side preference and its associations with occlusal, temporomandibular and prosthodontic factors: results from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-0). J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Aug;35(8):613-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01790.x.
8. Martinez-Gomis J, Lujan-Climent M, Palau S, Bizar J, Salsench J, Peraire M. Relationship between chewing side preference and handedness and lateral asymmetry of peripher al factors. Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Feb;54(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.09.006
9. Christensen LV, Radue JT. Lateral preference in mastication: a feasibility study. J Oral Rehabil. 1985 Sep;12(5):421-7.
10. Nissan J, Gross MD, Shifman A, Tzadok L, Assif D. Chewing side preference as a type of hemispheric laterality. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 May;31(5):412-6.
11. Liu J, Jin Z, Li Q. Effect of occlusal hypofunction and its recovery on the three-dimensional architecture of mandibular alveolar bone in growing rats. J Surg Res. 2015 Jan;193(1):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.015.
12. Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S, Bresin A, Ammann P. Effect of different masticatory functional and mechanical demands on the structural adaptation of the mandibular alveolar bone in young growing rats. Bone. 2004 Jul;35(1):191-7.
13. Bourrin S, Palle S, Pupier R, Vico L, Alexandre C. Effect of physical training on boné adaptation in three zones of the rat tíbia. J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Nov;10(11):1745-52.
14. Bresin A, Kiliaridis S, Strid KG. Effect of masticatory function on the internal bone structure in the mandible of the growing rat. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999 Feb;107(1):35-44.
15. Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):809-18.
16. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8.
17. Denes BJ, Mavropoulos A, Bresin A, Kiliaridis S. In uence of masticatory hypofunction on the alveolar bone and the molar periodontal ligament space in the rat maxilla. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Dec;121(6):532-7. doi: 10.1111/eos.12092.
18. Suhr ES, Warita H, Iida J, Soma K. The effect of occlusal hypofunction and its recovery on the periodontal tissues of the rat molar: ED1 immunohistochemical study. Orthod Waves. 2002;61:165-72.
19. Hitos SF, Solé D, Periotto MC, Fernandes ML, Weckx LL, Guedes ZC. Standardization of the registration and analysis of mastication: proposal for clinical application. Int J Orofacial Myology. 2011 Nov;37:47-56.
20. Barcelos DC, da Silva MA, Batista GR, Pleffken PR, Pucci CR, Borges AB, et al. Absence or weak correlation between chewing side preference and lateralities in primary, mixed and permanent dentition. Arch Oral Biol. 2012 Aug;57(8):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.02.022.
21. Felício CM, Folha GA, Ferreira CL, Medeiros AP. Expanded protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores: Validity and reliability. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov;74(11):1230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.021.
22. Macdonnell ST, Hector MP, Hannigan A. Chewing side preferences in children. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Sep;31(9):855-60.
23. Garib DG, Calil LR, Leal CR, Janson G. Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics? Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Sep-Oct;19(5):136-49. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.136-149.sar.
24. Nascimento GKBO, Lima LM, Freitas MCR, Silva EGF, Balata PMM, Cunha DA, et al. Preference side masticatory and facial symmetry in total laryngectomy: clinical and electromyographic study. Rev CEFAC. 2013 Nov-Dec;15(6):1525-32. doi: 10.1590/S1516-18462013000600015.
Published
2017-10-24
How to Cite
CAMPOS, Marcio José da Silva et al. Transverse dimension of the alveolar bone in different masticatory patterns. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, [S.l.], p. e17032, oct. 2017. ISSN 1677-3225. Available at: <https://www.fop.unicamp.br/bjos/index.php/bjos/article/view/56>. Date accessed: 15 july 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v16i1.8650492.
Section
Original Research